He, in turn, counter-sued them for defamation of character and filing a “false police report. The couple then filed a complaint with the police that the man had stolen their dogs. When the couple tried to get the dogs back from the defendant, he then turned around and tried to charge them $500. She says that common sense tells her the plaintiff would have sold the dogs herself if this fact didn’t matter to her. The defendant claims he never made a verbal agreement with the woman on this stipulation. A few days later, the plaintiff says she saw an ad from this man on Craigslist now selling the dogs. The plaintiff claims that she and the defendant had an understanding about this requirement and he agreed when taking the dogs. A woman, in need of a break, drops off her kids with her mother-in-law and is accused of breaking a door down to get them back a week later a woman pleads guilty to stealing from her ex-roommate then comes to court to sue the victim of her burglary. The couple put an ad on Craigslist to give away her two dogs, but explicitly stated she wanted them to be re-homed together. ![]() In this disturbing case, the plaintiffs needed to sell their home and move to a new place where they could not bring their dogs. No surprise, Judge Judy ends up ruling in favor of the plaintiff. After taking the dog to a vet for an exam, the vet gives a statement that the dog is “special needs” and exhibits abnormal fear and anxiety. The plaintiff also claims the dog was not housebroken, and the defendants mislead her on that point. Judge Judy states the defendants lied about the age of the dog and they asked for double the amount of money ($400) they paid for it, knowing it had problems. Because the defendants wanted a playful dog for their child, they put an ad out to try to sell the dog, recoup some money and buy a new dog. In the next proceeding, a woman regrets taking a family trip to Disney World with her ex-boyfriends new fiancee. A profit dispute leaves them fighting over a personal loan. First up, former classmates reunite after 35 years and begin to date and flip houses together. ![]() The Yorkie-Poo was nervous and shaky for the first month the defendants had her, but claim she was a normal lap dog otherwise (although not playful). In this episode, the Judge rules on two cases. The defendants claim they paid a breeder ($200) who had 31 dogs Judge Judy posits that the dog was probably from a puppy mill. The plaintiff claims the dog was “emotionally damaged” and after 24 hours, she returned it to its original owners. ![]() In this episode, which seems to be from 2007 but was posted to YouTube in February of 2017, a woman sues a couple to return the money she paid for a female Yorkshire Terrier Poodle mix.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |